BRS 2003 Annual Meeting Minutes

Share this page



May 31, 2003

(from the August 2003 BRS Quarterly – issue #119)

The 30th annual meeting of the Society’s Board of Directors was held
on Friday evening, May 30, 2003 at 8 pm at Lake Forest College in Lake
Forest, Illinois. Directors present were Rosalind Carey, Dennis Darland,
Peter Friedman, David Goldman, Tim Madigan, Steve Reinhardt, Cara Rice,
Warren Allen Smith, Peter Stone, Chad Trainer, Thom Weidlich, and David
White. David White called the meeting to order and reviewed the
meeting’s agenda. Members present who are not Directors were Anthony
Anderson, Alan Bock, Pat Bock, Phil Ebersole, David Henehan, Alvin
Hofer, Kevin Klement, Gregory Landini, Steve Maragides, and David

Election of Officers was taken up first. All incumbents were elected by acclamation:

President: Alan Schwerin

Vice President: Ray Perkins

Vice President for Outreach: Peter Friedman

Secretary of the Society and Board: Chad Trainer

Treasurer: Dennis Darland

Chairman of the Board: David White.

The absence of Alan Schwerin from the meeting was noted along
with the consequent need to nominate a temporary president for
Saturday’s Business meeting. Thom Weidlich nominated David White who won
by acclamation.

After the election of officers, the American Philosophical
Association Committee was brought up. The nature and procedures of the
APA sessions was explained. A report was given on the BRS’s sessions at
the APA Eastern meetings (which have been occurring every year), as well
as its sessions at the APA’s Central, and Pacific meetings (which have
not occurred quite as regularly). Attendance at the sessions was
described as “sailing pretty closely to the wind” but “sufficient.”
Success in people signing up for the BRS at a Central Division meeting
was also mentioned. The position of APA Committee Chairman was then
brought up for consideration. Thom Weidlich nominated David White for
the position and Peter Stone seconded it.

The subject of the Book Award Committee was addressed next.
Specifically, the issue raised was whether there should be a third
category for books written in languages other than English (in addition
to the first category for authors of books written in English and the
second category for edited editions of Russell’s writings). Furthermore
the question was posed whether it is necessary for the Committee to be
empowered to apply standards to such books different from those it
applies to ones written in English. Steve Maragides said that, while he
saw no problem with the Committee being empowered to consider books
according to several categories, it would be presumptuous to assume
members of the Committee would be in a position to judge books written
in foreign languages. Phil Ebersole explained that, as a member of this
Committee, he has no way of judging such books that get passed over.
While Ebersole said that he was not “wedded” to the idea of a change
here, he said it would be “rude” to expressly reserve the terms of the
award to books written in English even if that is the nature of the
situation by default.

There was discussion of whether the only way to be fair to books
written in languages other than English is to have a separate category
for the Book Award Committee’s prize and whether this would simplify the
Committee’s work. Ed Boedeker remarked that French, German, and English
should be the implicit languages of books under consideration and that
this implicit criterion, along with the Committee’s competence in the
award process, should be made as explicit as possible. Thom Weidlich
indicated his support for a Foreign Language Award, and Gregory Landini
said it was bad public relations for the awarding criteria to be
unabashedly confined to books written in English. David White mentioned
merits to having ad hoc members and consultants here and made a motion
to empower the committee to have this third, “foreign languages”
category, should it deem itself competent to judge here. But then Thom
Weidlich moved to “shelve” the issue and Peter Stone seconded this

Next on the agenda was the editorship of the BRS Quarterly
(BRSQ). This was a matter to be addressed as a result of Peter Stone’s
desire to be relieved of this position as a result of his now being on a
tenure-track position at Stanford University. It was announced that
Rosalind Carey and John Ongley have come forward as willing candidates
to co-chair the BRSQ Committee. The Board proceeded to appoint Rosalind
and John to these positions. Peter Stone was thanked for his excellent
work as Editor of the BRSQ and getting the whole cycle of the
newsletter’s release back on track. The Chair also made reference to a
forthcoming three-day celebration of Peter Stone’s work along these

The Chair then brought up Ray Perkins’ suggestion of a
“Promotional Items Committee” of sorts charged with handling the sale
and distribution of BRS t-shirts and aided by the creation of a related
URL, but attention was also drawn to potential copyright complications
in Russell attire. Steve Maragides encouraged the Society to look into
Bertrand Russell calendars as well. Peter Friedman moved to create such a
committee. Thom Weidlich seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.

The locus of the 2004 Annual Meeting was the following topic on
the docket. Mention was made of Ray Perkins’ willingness to host the
meeting at Plymouth State College in New Hampshire. California was also
cited as a future possibility, especially in light of Peter Stone’s
upcoming move to the state. However, Stone hastened to stress the busy
personal schedule he foresaw for at least the next couple of years.
Stephen Reinhardt then made a motion to have New Hampshire as the site
of next year’s meeting. Peter Stone seconded the motion and it passed
unanimously. The advisability of seriously considering future sites at
least a couple of years ahead was mentioned. Gregory Landini offered the
University of Iowa as a candidate where the BRS meeting could be
arranged so as to dovetail with the university’s annual
Wittgenstein/Russell Conference. Chad Trainer countered that previous
suggestions of the BRS meetings being held during the academic year had
typically eventuated in the specter of less affordable rooming rates for
the participants. Rosalind Carey encouraged people to bear in mind the
possible perks that can accompany the hosting of conferences and
instanced a $5,000 donation from an alumnus to Lake Forest’s Philosophy
Department as a consequence of last year’s meeting.

A proposal to translate Russell’s A History of Western Philosophy into Armenian was then addressed. The would-be translator in this case is a man who has already translated into Armenian Why I Am Not a Christian and who has a publisher satisfied with and on board for this translation of Russell’s History
but who acknowledges budgetary complications in such an undertaking.
David White explained that, while the BRS is hardly in a position to
provide financial assistance for this endeavor, genuine possibilities to
be considered by the BRS are a letter of support for the translations, a
commitment from the Society to purchase a given number of copies, and a
donation of space in the Society’s quarterly newsletter to advertising
the translation. After explanations by Steve Maragides and Dennis
Darland of a grant previously made to McMaster University for
Russell-related work, Peter Friedman suggested the utility of
corresponding with whatever local chapters of the BRS are to be found in
Armenia. Friedman made a motion to have a letter of commendation
drafted for the Armenian translation project. Peter Stone then proposed
as an amendment to this motion that the Executive Committee be empowered
to promote the Armenian translation project provided it does not result
in any financial cost to the Society. This amended motion passed

Concern with impressing upon the Directors the crisis of
declining membership, its causes, and remedies were next on the agenda.
David White suggested as a partial solution to membership decline
prolonging the membership of those who have not paid in a timely
fashion. Dennis Darland argued, instead, for such an approach quite
possibly compounding the problem. Peter Stone inquired about the
repercussions for membership volume of including membership forms in the
quarterly newsletter and Darland indicated that such results were
negligible. The possible merits of free memberships were discussed.
Friedman stressed the propriety of distinguishing between a financial
crisis and a membership crisis. Chad Trainer encouraged the Society to
consider membership information that could be provided on something the
size of a business card and so presentable to potential members in a
fashion less awkward that that involved in trying to give them standard
membership forms. Possible new designs for membership forms were
considered and then, in response to an inquiry from Thom Weidlich,
Darland furnished the Society with a report on membership trends.

Friedman pondered the possibilities of book inserts for BRS membership
in Routledge’s publications. He pointed to Routledge’s obviously vested
interests in the promotion of Bertrand Russell, as well as the distinct
possibility of their interest in Russell-related events. Peter Stone
cited the hitherto negative reaction from Routledge on these fronts.
There was, however, general discussion of Routledge’s catalog possibly
including as filler ads for the BRS. Cara Rice and Chad Trainer asked
about the possibilities of BRS members volunteering to insert
promotional material for the Society at their local corporate bookstores
in the stores’ relevant books. David White and Peter Stone countered
that it was basically unheard of for stores to permit such a thing and
White said that opportunities for postings on such stores’ bulletin
boards are a more realistic area to explore. Peter Stone explained that,
generally speaking, slight changes to present practices in
promoting membership tend to be more realistic and practical than the
grandiose, visionary approaches that, while abounding in ideas lack
“people attached to the ideas.”

David Henehan explained what he saw as the shortcomings of the Society’s
newsletter regularly including renewal forms vis-à-vis individually
mailed dues notices. David White responded that a modification here
entails a whole additional realm of activity and so an individual
willing to do it. The possibility of having people volunteer to contact
those whose membership has lapsed was next discussed and then the
advantages of readily reproducible membership forms in the Society’s
mailings. It was then discussed how extensions of membership for those
who are behind on their dues is most appropriately left for an
“executive” decision. Dennis Darland mentioned the possibility of
advertising the BRS in the Nation magazine and around college
campuses. Peter Stone explained that it was precisely by means of campus
advertisements that he himself got involved in the Society. Peter
Friedman mentioned the possibly cheap rate of advertising in the
“far-right column” of Google but the possibly minimal rate in the area
of $500 was considered as well. Peter Stone drew attention to the
operative role of John Lenz and while not foreseeing a need to put money
forth on website developments indicated his willingness to make the
relevant inquiries along these lines. Thom Weidlich mentioned the value
generally to increased internet activity for the BRS in making
membership more attractive.

Peter Stone then moved to adjourn the meeting. Cara Rice seconded.

Chad Trainer, Secretary, BRS



May 31, 2003

After lunch, the BRS held its 2003 annual Business Meeting from 1pm
to 2pm. David White began the meeting by explaining that he had been
elected to serve as president pro tem as a result of President Alan
Schwerin’s absence. The Treasurer’s report was mentioned, as well as its
having already been reported in the Bertrand Russell Society Quarterly.
The current balance was said to be $8,804.18. Warren Allen Smith asked
for a clarification of membership loss. Dennis Darland explained that,
while more people are renewing their memberships, there is a lower
amount of new members joining. Presently, the Society has approximately a
hundred members (discounting about fifty people who are probably
renewing); whereas there was once a high of three-hundred members.

Peter Stone mentioned membership forms available in the May BRS Quarterly
(BRSQ). On the subject of the BRSQ, he asked the presenters to consider
submitting to the BRSQ versions of the papers being presented that

David White brought up Ken Blackwell’s interest in developing
guidelines for the “chapterization” of BRS locals, specifically, the
advantages of coming up with a five-step approach that could be of use
for those interested in trying to form local chapters of the Society.
There was discussion of the base of experienced people in attendance
from Rochester and New York City, the fate of the one-time Philippine
chapter of the BRS, and the like.

The five-step program then, as outlined and recommended by David White was:

1) Stage events with a built-in audience, as part of a program with organizations that already have a following.

2) Make joining as easy as possible, and supply new members with a membership kit. (This was done in the past.)

3) Keep a record of all activities of the BRS and its chapters in a form that is easy to distribute.

4) Make clear to members what your main aims are, e.g., humanitarianism,
anti-war movement, philosophical clarity, fellowship, letter-writing,
Russell studies, teaching Russell, social drinking. Each chapter should
be built about the interests of its members and not try to take on
everything at once. Likewise, all members should be clear on what
resources are available to them, e.g., Bertrand Russell Archives,
Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation, BRS Library, other chapters, and
other organizations.

5) Make as much use as possible of free publicity. Certainly keep
sending material to the BRSQ, but also to bookstores, UU churches, and

While no vote was taken, the consensus was that BRS members are
free to form “autonomous” chapters and that, except in cases of express
permission from the BRS, local chapters are to refrain from speaking on
behalf of the Society or in any way entangling the BRS in obligations.
David Goldman proposed having meetings of the Greater Rochester Russell
Set audio- or videotaped for general distribution.

Next mentioned was the subject of recruiting members for the BRS
via the internet. Thom Weidlich explained that, with different people
wanting different things, there would be advantages to a dedicated
e-mail list for providing a weekly e-mail with a Russell quote and
membership encouragement. Tim Madigan and David White spoke of the need
for a website URL simpler than John Lenz’s, especially considering that
the related costs of such reforms are well within what the President
could authorize without further action. Peter Friedman said that, in
addition to making the BRS site more “user-friendly,” provisions should
be considered for both an automated “sign-up” procedure for would-be BRS
members and a regular inclusion of BRS related news. The consensus of
those present was that John Lenz would probably not be averse to
enabling others to manage the site.

The meeting then concluded at 2 pm.

Chad Trainer, BRS Secretary



Friday to Sunday, May 30 to June 1, 2003

The Bertrand Russell Society returned to Lake Forest College in
Illinois for its 30th annual meeting. The meeting was from Friday, May
30 2003 to Sunday, June 1. In attendance were Anthony Anderson, Alan
Bock, Pat Bock, Rosalind Carey, Dennis Darland, Peter Friedman, Phil
Ebersole, David Goldman, David Henehan, Alvin Hofer, Kevin Klement,
Gregory Landini, Tim Madigan, Steve Maragides, John Ongley, Stephen
Reinhardt, Cara Rice, Warren Allen Smith, Peter Stone, David Taylor,
Chad Trainer, Thom Weidlich, David White, and Linda White.

On Friday there was registration and a book table from 4 pm to 6
pm. From 6 pm to 8 pm there was a buffet. This was followed by the BRS
board meeting from 8:30 pm to 9:30 pm (See “Bertrand Russell Society
2003 Annual Board of Directors Meeting Minutes”) and then members
enjoyed the Greater Rochester Russell Set’s hospitality suite/salon.

The Saturday morning program began with Gregory Landini
presenting his paper on “Tractarian Logicism,” followed by Anthony
Anderson’s “The Axiom of Infinity in Russellian Intensional Logic,” and
Kevin Klement’s “Russell and Wittgenstein on Type-Theory and Russell’s
Paradox” was the last paper of the morning. After lunch, the BRS held
its 2003 annual Business Meeting from 1pm to 2pm. (See “Bertrand Russell
Society 2003 Annual Membership Meeting Minutes”)

The Saturday afternoon presentations began with Chad Trainer’s
paper: “Bertrand Russell’s Assessments of René Descartes’ Philosophy.”
This was followed by this year’s Prize Paper, David Taylor’s “Causal
Processes: A Realist Approach.” The next presenter was Rosalind Carey
with “Logic and Psychology in Russell’s Doctrine of Belief: An Overview
and a Special Case” and then John Ongley’s “Russell’s Slow Progress to

After some free time, there was the Red Hackle hour with the
eponymous beverage provided courtesy of Don Jackanicz. There was then
the banquet where the Bertrand Russell Society’s 2003 Award was given in
absentia to Katha Pollitt. The Book Award was given to Ray Perkins for
the book he edited of Russell’s letters to the editor, Yours Faithfully, Bertrand Russell,
and a statement from Ray Perkins acknowledging the award was read by
Rosalind Carey. Warren Allen Smith and Tim Madigan provided some very
entertaining “piano comedy” next with Warren Allen Smith acting as
Ludwig Wittgenstein and Tim Madigan acting as Bertrand Russell. The
evening was then topped off again with the Greater Rochester Russell
Set’s hospitality suite/salon.

The Sunday morning papers began with Cara E. Rice’s “The Beacon
Light of Beacon Hill Shines On,” followed by Tim Madigan’s “The
Philosophical Analysis of The Warren Report by Bertrand Russell,
Josiah Thompson, and Richard Popkin.” Finally, we concluded with a joint
presentation by Peter Stone and David White: “Is This Game Played? A
Conversation on Wittgenstein’s Poker.”


This year, the BRS Awards Committee decided to give the BRS Award to
Katha Pollitt. Kevin Brodie, BRS Awards Committee Chair, offered the
following remarks in support of this decision:

Katha Pollitt is an award-winning journalist who is a regular columnist for the Nation. She is the author of several books, including Reasonable Creatures: Essays on Women and Feminism (Vintage, 1995) and Subject to Debate: Sense and Dissents on Women, Politics, and Culture
(Random House, 2001). Throughout her career, she has been an articulate
and vociferous champion of those who are disenfranchised and oppressed
throughout the world. She has been one of the foremost spokespersons for
feminism and reproductive rights. She has also expressed skepticism
regarding religious dogma, and has frequently criticized religious
leaders for using their influence to repress freedom, particularly as it
relates to women.

Upon learning that she had received the award, Ms. Pollitt
proclaimed she was “thrilled to be associated with Bertrand Russell,
whom she admired, and was a hero to her parents.”

The text of the award reads as follows:

The 2003 Bertrand Russell Society Award

presented to Ms. Katha Pollitt

for intellectual courage and indubitable wit

in the spirit of Bertrand Russell.


The BRS Book Award Committee decided to give the 2003 BRS Book Award to Ray Perkins for his edited collection Yours Faithfully, Bertrand Russell: Lifelong Fight for Peace, Justice, and Truth in Letters to the Editor
(Open Court, 2001). (As Awards Committee Chair, Ray abstained
completely from the decision-making process this year because his book
was a candidate for the award.) Ray Perkins was unable to attend the
2003 Annual Meeting to accept the award in person; however, he did send
the following remarks that were read at the meeting:

My collection of Russell’s letters to the editor has been a long
labor, but truly one of love. As some of you may know, my editorial
interest in Russell’s letters began back in the early 70s soon after I
became aware that Ken Blackwell and Harry Ruja were collecting them for
the Archives. But in fact my interest in Russell’s letters really goes
back to my encounter with his 1967 book War Crimes in Vietnam which reprinted his passionate exchange with the editor of the New York Times
regarding US chemical weapons in South East Asia. What these letters
show, and what I think his public letters generally reveal, is the
practical wisdom of a great intellect come down from the ivory tower of
academia to do battle with the forces of ignorance and cruelty and to
infuse public policy with reason and compassion. As we witness the
unfolding of the new Pax Americana and the resurgence of the threat of
weapons of mass destruction, Russell’s public letters, especially those
since World War II, take on a renewed relevance, and his example as
practical philosopher and public gadfly continues today to teach and
inspire us all.

I’d like to thank the Society for honoring me with this
prestigious award. It’s one of which I am very proud and one which I
shall long cherish. And I want to add a special “thank you” to the
Bertrand Russell Archives and especially to Ken Blackwell without whose
assiduous work over nearly three decades these letters would not have
been obtainable. Again, thank you all very much.

Sincerely (or should I say “Yours faithfully”?),

Ray Perkins, Jr.